Author Archives: R M Qualtrough
Here is the full text of the appeal trial of William Herbert Wallace. His appeal was successful and his conviction overturned, with the judges unanimously deciding that the evidence did not provide the certainty necessary to justify a verdict of guilty.
If you have any information on this case, please leave a comment below.
Here is the trial in full, unabridged, with annotations exactly as I found them. This is more complete than Wyndham-Brown’s transcription, which is edited and leaves out various statements.
Here you will find selected newspaper clippings included in the case files at the National Archives.
A man named Robert Carr very persistently pressed for his testimony to be taken into account. He claims to have seen William Herbert Wallace with his sister-in-law Amy Wallace at Scotland Road at 8 PM on the night of the murder.
The authors of these letters discuss the receipt of an anonymous postcard with a confession. The actual postcard was not inside the case file, so I was unable to photograph that.
Here, in the Justice of the Peace and Local Government Review, issued June 13, 1931, there is a lengthy discussion about the Wallace case and appeal.
This appears to be a list of points for the prosecution, which they will attempt to use to convict William Herbert Wallace.
A report on the mental state of William Herbert Wallace during his stay in prison. He is deemed fit to stand trial.
A report of William Herbert Wallace’s stay at the Royal Southern Hospital. Admitted: 9th June 1930, Discharged: 10th July 1930. Renal deficiency suspected.
This is the application William sent requesting an appeal for his conviction. It includes his list of reasons as to why he deserves another trial.
A report containing details of Wallace’s character, including statements from a number of individuals who knew him personally.
These articles which appeared in John Bull were ghostwritten for Wallace. It details his experiences with the murder, trial, and his theories on what happened to Julia.
This is what appears to be notes on William Herbert Wallace and the trial, written for the appeal perhaps? A note at the end states that after this was written, the conviction was quashed. Inscriptions may be by his defendent, Roland Oliver.
Notes on the trial of William Herbert Wallace, written by the judge. For the unabridged transcript of the trial, please see: